Creating Transparent Promotion Rubrics to Combat Nepotism
Designed for HR Business Partners designing new promotion processes for mid-sized tech companies experiencing rapid growth to spark real collaboration and high-energy learning.
A 90-minute physical workshop held in a conference room with HRBPs and People Ops managers. The audience is frustrated by informal processes that lead to perceptions of favoritism and recurring complaints about unclear promotion criteria. They need practical tools to build trust and fairness into high-stakes promotion cycles.
Promotion Myths Bingo
Kick off with an interactive bingo card featuring common myths and hunches about promotions (e.g., 'The loudest person wins', 'Manager's favorite always gets promoted'). Participants mark what they've heard or believe. Quick group share to reveal pattern clusters.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
This primes curiosity and surfaces underlying beliefs, giving you a quick map of the room’s starting assumptions and energy.
Nepotism: Spot the Red Flags
Show three anonymized candidate summaries from real promotion cases, each with subtle signs of potential nepotism (e.g., vague rationales, missing evidence, manager advocacy unsupported by data). Small groups identify all possible bias signals and share their findings.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
This sharpens diagnostic skills and reveals common blind spots, using real-world ambiguity.
Criteria Cards Warm-Up
Present a deck of role-specific criteria cards (e.g., 'Consistently mentors peers', 'Delivers on cross-team projects'). Invite participants to select two they think are essential to a fair promotion—and one they think is commonly overvalued. Share choices in pairs.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
This lowers pressure by focusing on values and simple choices, not personal performance. It encourages dialogue in a non-threatening way.
Promotion Rubric Relay Race
Small teams race to build a promotion rubric from a mix of relevant and misleading factors. Each round, teams must quickly justify keeping or discarding a criterion, simulating time-pressured real-world decision-making.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
The competitive format energizes the room while forcing clear, public reasoning about criteria. It trains prioritization under pressure.
The Dilemma: Case of the Beloved Manager
Present a scenario: a highly popular manager’s direct report is up for promotion but lacks documented evidence. Ask, ‘Do we bend the rubric?’ Debate in two groups: one argues for strict adherence, one for flexibility. Quick-fire arguments, then swap sides.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
This real-world hook forces participants to grapple with applied ethics and the tension between rules and exceptions—mirroring boardroom debate.
Personal Rubric Commitment
Invite each participant to write down one concrete action they will take to strengthen transparency in their next promotion cycle. Share commitments in small pods, then seal them in an envelope for accountability follow-up.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Active reflection and social commitment increase follow-through, and personal stakes create lasting change.
Sign up to unlock 3 more activities
Get the full pack, facilitation flow, and more ready-to-run ideas.