How to Identify and Resolve Microaggressions in Tech Workplaces
Designed for Mid-level software engineering managers overseeing diverse, cross-functional tech teams in rapidly scaling SaaS companies to spark real collaboration and high-energy learning.
A 75-minute hybrid workshop for engineering managers who struggle to spot subtle microaggressions in highly technical environments. Participants report frequent tension in code review feedback and project planning, with many feeling unsure how to intervene without disrupting team morale or productivity.
Spot the Subtle Signals
Kick off with a rapid-fire quiz featuring real Slack and GitHub comment screenshots (anonymized) from tech teams. Participants vote: 'Microaggression or Not?' revealing how subtle bias often appears disguised as technical critique. The payoff: instant intrigue and surprise at what counts as a microaggression.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Curiosity-driven entry leverages novelty and relevance, priming managers to notice hidden patterns before deeper content. This taps cognitive intrigue and creates a safe starting point.
False Friend Feedback
Show two nearly identical code review comments, one with a hidden microaggression ('Looks like someone needs a refresher on loops'), and another constructive ('Would you like help with optimizing this loop?'). Invite participants to identify the difference and challenge their assumptions.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Revealing misconceptions encourages cognitive dissonance, helping managers distinguish between tough feedback and subtle bias.
Microaggression Bingo Board
Participants receive a digital or print bingo board with everyday microaggressions found in tech: like 'Actually, it’s pronounced...' or 'Just Google it.' As you call out scenarios, they mark their board if they've seen it. No pressure, just honest reflection and quick check-ins.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Low-pressure gamification lowers defensiveness and invites candid participation. Everyone can relate without feeling exposed.
Intervention Improv Relay
Split the room into pairs. Each duo gets a microaggression scenario ('A teammate repeatedly interrupts a junior engineer'). One manager role-plays the bystander, the other tries different intervention lines (e.g., 'Let’s hear Sarah’s idea fully.'). After 60 seconds, teams rotate partners, keeping the energy high and encouraging experimentation.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
High-energy practice builds real confidence and muscle memory, while peer feedback normalizes intervention.
The Team Dilemma Decision
Present a real-life dilemma: 'A highly valued engineer makes microaggressive jokes during sprint planning, but the team hesitates to call it out.' Invite managers to weigh three options: address directly, escalate privately, or ignore for now. Discuss the short-term and long-term effects of each route.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Anchoring in a real dilemma makes the stakes tangible. Exploring consequences reinforces how choices shape culture and retention.
Personal Micro-Moment Mapping
Invite managers to privately jot down a moment when they witnessed or were unsure about a possible microaggression. Then, ask them to map what they did (or didn't do), and what they'd try differently now. Volunteers can choose to share, making it personal and actionable.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Active reflection deepens learning, connecting theory to managers’ own experience. Sharing stories normalizes vulnerability and builds commitment.
Sign up to unlock 3 more activities
Get the full pack, facilitation flow, and more ready-to-run ideas.