Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Designed for Engineering Managers and technical leaders addressing performance concerns with experienced engineers to spark real collaboration and high-energy learning.
A practical workshop for managers who need to diagnose performance patterns, clarify expectations, coach respectfully, and preserve senior engineers' autonomy and professional trust.
The First Explanation Is Simple
Participants review a scenario involving a senior engineer whose delivery pace and communication have changed over several weeks. They choose what the manager should do next, then receive additional context about shifting priorities, mentoring responsibilities, unclear ownership, and interruptions. The exercise shows how quickly observable behavior can lead to an incomplete conclusion. Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
The delayed context turns performance diagnosis into an evidence exercise and discourages managers from treating a signal as a conclusion.
Same Pattern, Different Context
Every group receives the same observable pattern: a senior engineer is completing less work, contributing less in meetings, and asking for more time. Each group secretly receives a different context, such as supporting teammates, unclear requirements, limited decision authority, or a major role change. Groups create a management response before comparing how the context changes it. Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
The hidden contexts show that similar behavior can come from very different conditions and therefore needs a context-sensitive response.
The Context Not Shared
Pairs work as manager and senior engineer. The manager receives recent delivery data and team observations. The engineer receives private context about competing priorities, uncertainty around expectations, and concerns about how their work is being assessed. The manager must run a coaching conversation that uncovers the wider picture without becoming overly directive. Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
The hidden context demonstrates that useful coaching begins by creating enough safety and clarity for important information to surface.
Support, Clarify, or Escalate
Teams receive twelve senior-engineer scenarios involving delivery pace, quality concerns, unclear priorities, reduced collaboration, missed commitments, mentoring load, and communication changes. They sort each situation into clearer expectations, additional support, direct coaching, closer follow-up, or a formal performance process. Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Forced ranking helps managers match the level of intervention to evidence quality, impact, and the duration of the pattern rather than reacting to every concern equally.
Two Coaching Conversations
Participants compare two conversations about the same performance concern. In the first, the manager gives broad feedback, lists several concerns, and prescribes a detailed plan. In the second, the manager shares specific observations, explains the impact, invites the engineer's perspective, and agrees on a small number of measurable commitments. Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
The comparison makes evidence, tone, and ownership visible and gives managers a practical model for respectful follow-through.
Receiving the Feedback
Participants take the role of a senior engineer receiving feedback from a manager. They experience several approaches, including vague concern, constant checking, highly prescriptive instructions, and specific evidence paired with clear expectations and autonomy. They evaluate which approach supports dignity, clarity, and meaningful ownership. Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Role reversal helps managers evaluate feedback by how it is experienced and acted upon rather than by how complete it sounds from the manager's side.
Sign up to unlock 3 more activities
Get the full pack, facilitation flow, and more ready-to-run ideas.