Managing Underperforming Senior Engineers Without Micromanagement
Designed for Experienced engineering leaders managing senior engineers for the first time, especially those inheriting legacy teams with mixed performance. to spark real collaboration and high-energy learning.
A 90-minute virtual workshop for engineering managers in mid-sized tech companies. Participants face resistance from senior engineers who are highly skilled but disengaged, and struggle to balance accountability with autonomy. Traditional performance management approaches often backfire, leading to frustration, morale dips, and risk of turnover.
Reverse Interview Icebreaker
Participants pair up and role-play as a senior engineer interviewing their manager about how they handle underperformance. The 'engineer' asks probing questions (e.g., 'What would you do if I missed a deadline?') while the 'manager' responds. After two minutes, roles switch. This activity builds intrigue about handling underperformance in ways that earn senior engineers’ respect.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Role-reversal sparks curiosity, surfaces mental models, and lowers defensiveness by letting managers see the issue through senior engineers’ eyes.
Micromanagement Mythbusters
Lead a quick poll with statements like, ‘Micromanagement is the only way to ensure accountability with senior engineers.’ Participants vote anonymously, then reveal poll results and discuss why these beliefs persist and where they break down.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Confronting misconceptions head-on helps learners update their beliefs, especially when they see others share their doubts.
Silent Sticky Note Brainstorm
Everyone gets 3 virtual sticky notes (using Miro or Jamboard). Without talking, they write one strategy per note for supporting underperforming senior engineers without micromanagement. After three minutes, notes are grouped and discussed. This lets quieter voices contribute and surfaces diverse ideas.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Low-pressure, silent brainstorming unlocks ideas from introverts and creates psychological safety for honest sharing.
Rapid Coaching Sprint
Facilitator shares a real-life dilemma: ‘A senior engineer is missing deadlines but insists their process is fine.’ Participants have 60 seconds to draft a coaching question they’d ask (e.g., ‘What do you see as the main blockers?’). Then, everyone rapid-fires their questions out loud in a round-robin, energizing the room with practical tactics.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
High-energy, quick-fire sprints break monotony, model actionable coaching language, and boost collective creativity under time pressure.
Accountability Dilemma Debate
Facilitator presents a real-world hook: ‘Your most senior engineer has slipped for three sprints, but is a key architect. If you escalate, you risk losing them. If you don’t, the team’s morale suffers.’ Two groups debate: one argues for intervention, one for a hands-off approach. Each group gets three minutes, then everyone votes on the most balanced solution.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Debate format sharpens critical thinking, reveals tradeoffs, and makes abstract dilemmas concrete and memorable.
Personal Leadership Postcard
Each participant writes a brief ‘postcard’ to themselves describing one new commitment for managing senior engineer performance without micromanaging (e.g., ‘I will schedule bi-weekly check-ins focused on blockers, not tasks.’). Cards are shared in pairs, then mailed to themselves as a reminder. This cements personal accountability and closes the loop.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Active reflection and personal connection boost transfer and ownership—making intentions tangible and actionable.
Sign up to unlock 3 more activities
Get the full pack, facilitation flow, and more ready-to-run ideas.