Structuring Clear Promotion Cases for Your Direct Reports
Designed for Mid-level team leads in tech companies who are preparing their first formal promotion recommendations for direct reports to spark real collaboration and high-energy learning.
A 75-minute hybrid workshop. Team leads are anxious about ‘getting it wrong’ and lack confidence in presentation skills; their organizations have inconsistent promotion criteria, and the stakes feel high due to competitive talent retention pressures.
Promotion Puzzle Reveal
Kick off with an interactive poll: ‘What do you think weighs most in promotion decisions—impact, visibility, or consistency?’ Instantly show the surprising spread of answers and share a real graph from your company’s last promotion cycle. Use this to spark curiosity about what’s truly valued in promotion cases.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Curiosity-driven polls activate learner engagement and surface hidden assumptions; they prime participants to learn by challenging their preconceptions.
Promotion Myth Crash
Share three common myths about promotion cases (e.g., ‘It’s all about tenure,’ ‘Self-promotion is frowned upon,’ ‘Managers can fudge criteria’). Invite participants to vote which is most dangerous, then reveal a real counterexample for each. End with an open Q&A to catch any lingering myths.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Revealing misconceptions reduces anxiety and cognitive bias, opening brains for new information and strategies.
Case Structure Sandbox
Offer a template for structuring a promotion case. Invite participants to fill in just one field (e.g., ‘quantified impact’) for a direct report, using sticky notes or a shared document. No pressure—everyone shares anonymously, with facilitator reading out a few key submissions.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Low-pressure, anonymous participation builds confidence and allows for safe rehearsal without fear of judgment.
Rapid-Fire Objection Showdown
Divide into pairs and run a ‘promotion objection blitz’: each person takes turns role-playing an exec who objects to a case (‘Not enough impact,’ ‘Too soon,’ ‘Bias risk’). The other must counter with one concrete piece of evidence or framing. Rotate fast, keeping energy high with a bell or timer.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
High-energy, active practice simulates real-world pressure and builds response agility; peer interaction strengthens recall.
Real-Life Dilemma: Promotion or Pause?
Present a real (anonymized) case study where a manager hesitated to submit a promotion request due to unclear evidence. Ask participants: ‘Would you submit or pause? Why?’ Collect responses, then reveal the actual decision and outcome (e.g., the manager paused and lost the employee to an external offer). Debrief on missed signals and best practices.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Anchoring learning in real dilemmas builds emotional investment and sharpens decision-making; seeing consequences deepens understanding.
Personal Impact Mirror
Invite participants to privately write a short ‘impact story’ for their own recent project, as if they were making a promotion case for themselves. Prompt them to reflect: ‘What would you highlight? What evidence matters most?’ Then pair up to share insights and discuss how personal biases shape their choices.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Active reflection strengthens transfer, and personal connection increases motivation; sharing insights builds empathy and perspective.
Sign up to unlock 3 more activities
Get the full pack, facilitation flow, and more ready-to-run ideas.