Technology evaluation
Designed for My audience are tech leads , group of 20 people le,their age group is between 25 to 35 to spark real collaboration and high-energy learning.
They have to apply the learnt lessons in their real life work scenarios.Make use of various frameworks.
Feature Wishlist Showdown
Write three competing new feature requests on the board: one from users (make onboarding faster), one from security (add MFA), and one from the CEO (increase engagement). Ask everyone to silently pick which feature they'd approve if they could only select one. Then, reveal how different technology evaluation frameworks (like RICE, MoSCoW) would prioritize the features and debate which method works best.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
By anchoring the frameworks in real, conflicting priorities, people see how these tools guide a tough decision rather than just being theory. Picking silently first lowers participation risk.
False Friends: Tech Myths
Present three statements tech leads often hear: (1) Open source is always more secure, (2) The newest framework always wins, (3) More microservices means better scalability. Ask everyone to vote true/false for each, then reveal what’s actually true and why.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
When people realize they’ve fallen for a popular myth, the correction sticks—and it opens up great discussion about sound technology evaluation.
Ticket Triage: Safe Entry
Hand out slips (physical or digital) that ask: 'What’s the trickiest type of bug or feature request you’ve ever had to evaluate?' Everyone writes anonymously. Shuffle and read a handful aloud, then connect each example to an evaluation framework.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Anonymous sharing lets even shy participants join in, and hearing real-life examples makes frameworks more relatable.
Red vs. Blue Sticky Debate
Stick up two posters: one says ‘In-House Build’, the other ‘Buy SaaS’. Everyone grabs a red or blue sticky and runs to vote for how their team would solve a real scenario: 'You need a new dashboard for business analytics.' After voting, ask each group to defend their choice using any technology evaluation framework.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Physical movement and color voting energize the room and make abstract trade-offs vivid. Group debate connects theory to real decision-making.
The 2am Incident Dilemma
Tell the group this scenario: At 2am, your production service fails, and business is losing money every minute. You must pick between a quick rollback, patching the bug, or switching to a backup system. Ask: which do you choose, and what criteria drive that decision? Reveal how different evaluation frameworks might steer the choice.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Connecting frameworks to a stressful, familiar crisis makes the trade-offs real. It encourages participants to see evaluation tools as helpful, not just theoretical.
Framework Mirror: Pair Share
Pair up participants and ask each to recall a recent real tech decision—maybe choosing a new library, handling a tough bug, or picking a deployment method. Each person explains what they did, while their partner applies an evaluation framework to that same decision and suggests what could have changed.
Tap to view the full activity.
Why this works
Hearing your real-life story echoed through a framework makes the theory personal and memorable. The pair format keeps the activity active, safe, and practical.
Sign up to unlock 3 more activities
Get the full pack, facilitation flow, and more ready-to-run ideas.